Cost Efficiency as a Strategy

Cost efficiency is the strategic choice for many construction companies. What strategies are feasible when it comes to price competition?

Cost efficiency is the strategic choice for many construction companies. When clients are well aware of what they want and when many rules and regulations guide the buyer and the seller, price competition prevails. What strategies are feasible when it comes to price competition?

“Competitive forces are beyond the control of most individual companies and their managers. They’re what you inherit, the reality that you have to deal with.” This quote is from Cynthia A. Montgomery’s The Strategist: Be the Leader Your Business Needs, a book I can recommend if you are interested in strategic thinking.

Montgomery points out that when making strategic decisions, you must understand and consider the industry’s competitive forces. To be successful, you must pick playing fields where you can win and position your business to work with, not against, the forces.

Cost efficiency as a strategic choice

Construction companies have several choices for their main strategic driver. They can be customer-oriented, competition-oriented, or resource and skills-oriented. Most construction firms are competition-oriented. As such, they can choose one of four competition-oriented drivers:

  1. Cost efficiency
  2. Differentiation
  3. Focus
  4. Attack, defense, or diversion against the competitors

Most companies in the same market seem to choose cost efficiency as their main strategic driver. This is based on their view of the clients’ priorities. The contractor who gets the job is among the two to three cheapest bidders.

Clients often point out that the price is not the determining factor. The contractor’s solution, presentation, and track record are considered. Between equal contractors, the cheapest bid will win

How to be profitably cost-efficient

Cost efficiency is one aspect of financial management and business that can become quite confusing. The following simplified diagram demonstrates three positions in the quality/price matrix. In this context, quality refers to the benefits customers receive when buying from a company. Higher quality usually means a higher price. The dotted line on the chart is the “industry profitability line.” Companies positioned under that line are not operating profitably in the long run.

cost efficiency

When analyzing your company’s performance in relation to the competition, you could, for example, conclude that you are at mark A on the chart. B and C are your two main competitors. What choices do you have to improve your situation? Your main options are:

  • Increase your cost efficiency while offering the same or lower quality or price. This increases your profits for the same price, positioning you as a low-cost provider.
  • Try to improve your customer’s perceived value with the same cost efficiency. In this case, you should be able to offer some benefits that your customers value, such as faster output or lower risk than the competition. Some companies can build an esteemed brand that allows them to charge higher than the industry average.
  • Improve both your efficiency and customer benefits. This is a demanding path that requires innovation or quite radical action inside the company.

Ways to boost your company’s efficiency

There are many ways to become cost-efficient. Efficiency is about doing more with less. Paying your employees less may not be a sustainable solution.

An average company spends 55 percent of its revenues on goods and services. In construction, that percentage can be well over 70. Being efficient in purchasing and subcontracting can, therefore, have a considerable effect.

The client-contractor relationship affects the contractor’s cost efficiency.  Some studies have shown that the profitability of similar types of projects varies depending on the client and the contractor’s project manager. Revamping client-contractor relationships and cooperation would be mutually beneficial.

Lean construction – the elimination of process and material waste – is a promising methodology that can increase efficiency once implemented systematically. Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) has also shown potential for improved process quality and efficiency.

Information management is the common denominator among all the above-mentioned efficiency boosters. BIM and collaborative, networked communication are key ingredients in that respect.

Find your winning combination

There is no silver bullet that will make a contractor cost-efficient on its own. You’ll need a well-managed combination of tools and techniques. Technology alone will not solve anything. Having the right people doing what they love and are enthusiastic about is the secret sauce that will make all the difference.

Aarni Heiskanen
Aarni Heiskanen

Aarni Heiskanen, a Finnish construction innovation agent, is hailed as a Top 10 thought leader in construction. Aarni has been a pioneer in CAD, he has co-founded a business software company, and worked as a certified management consultant. He runs AE Partners, a construction innovation agency. Aarni holds a master's degree in architecture.
Connect with Aarni on LinkedIn

Articles: 1101